The iPhone 16 is finally here, and we have already performed benchmark tests between the A18 and A18 Pro chipsets. Now it’s time for a benchmark comparison between the iPhone 16 and the Samsung Galaxy S24. Both phones boast top-tier hardware and come with a host of AI capabilities. So, let’s dive into the benchmark results and compare the two across several key metrics: CPU, GPU, memory, and AI processing.
Table of Contents
A18 vs Exynos 2400: Specs
| iPhone 16 | Galaxy S24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | September 2024 | January 2024 |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Samsung |
| Fabrication Process | 3nm | 4nm LPP+ |
| CPU | 6-core CPU 2x performance 4x efficiency cores | Ten-core 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| GPU | 5-core GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| RAM | 8 GB, LPDDR5 (Unconfirmed) | 8 GB, LPDDR5X |
| Storage Type | NVMe | UFS 3.1 (128GB only), UFS 4.0 |
| USB Type | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| 5G Modem | Qualcomm’s new X70 | Exynos 5400 |
| Connectivity | Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3 | Wi-Fi 6e, Bluetooth 5.3 |
Geekbench 6 CPU
When it comes to raw CPU power, Geekbench 6 gives a clear comparison of how both devices perform in single-core and multi-core tests. The iPhone 16 with A18 SoC scores an impressive 3053 in the single-core test, outperforming the Galaxy S24’s Exynos 2400 by about 50%. The gap becomes even more pronounced in the multi-core test, with the iPhone reaching 7601, which is roughly 26% higher than the Galaxy S24’s 6018. Seems like even after having 4 extra cores, the Exynos 2400 is still not able to outperform the A18.
| Geekbench 6 CPU | iPhone 16 | Samsung S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Single-core | 3053 | 2036 |
| Multi-core | 7601 | 6018 |
AnTuTu Benchmark
The AnTuTu benchmark evaluates overall system performance, where the iPhone 16 leads by about 5% compared to the Galaxy S24. Although the gap may seem modest, the A18 chipset on iPhone 16 pulls ahead significantly in areas like CPU, achieving a 24% higher score, and in UX, where it has a 32% advantage.
However, the Galaxy S24 edges out the iPhone in GPU performance by about 4%, and it shows a much stronger lead in memory, outperforming the iPhone 16 by a substantial 43%. While we know that Samsung is using LPDDR5X memory, it seems the iPhone is using LPDDR5 memory, which likely contributes to its lower score, although we cannot confirm this with certainty.
Disclaimer: Antutu scores for iOS and Android are not directly comparable due to differences in system architecture, APIs, and test methods. So don’t blindly trust these results.
| AnTuTu Test | iPhone 16 | Samsung S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1443691 | 1375770 |
| CPU | 418631 | 338635 |
| GPU | 499599 | 519711 |
| Memory | 175395 | 251274 |
| UX | 350066 | 266150 |
Geekbench 6 GPU
In the Geekbench 6.3 GPU test, the A18 processor scores 27,914, significantly outperforming the Exynos 2400, which scores 15,912. This translates to the iPhone 16 delivering about 75% better GPU performance than the Galaxy S24.
This makes the iPhone 16 a powerhouse for handling graphic-intensive tasks like gaming, video editing, and AR applications, where GPU strength is crucial. The result contradicts the GPU score we saw in the AnTuTu Benchmark where Samsung S24 scored better than the iPhone counterpart.
| Phone | Geekbench 6 GPU |
|---|---|
| iPhone 16 | 27914 |
| Samsung S24 | 15912 |
3D Mark WildLife Extreme Test
In the 3DMark WildLife Extreme Test, the iPhone 16 achieves an overall score of 3810, while the Galaxy S24 scores 3537. This represents a 7.7% higher score for the A18, indicating slightly better performance in high-demand, GPU-intensive tasks. In terms of average frame rate, there isn’t much difference between the iPhone 16 and Galaxy S24.
| 3D Mark test | iPhone 16 | Samsung S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 3810 | 3537 |
| Average frame rate | 22.8 FPS | 21.18 FPS |
Geekbench AI
When it comes to AI-related tasks, the iPhone 16 stands out, significantly outperforming the Galaxy S24 across the board, especially in NPU scores. Whether measuring single, half, or quantized precision, the iPhone’s NPU shows clear superiority. However, keep in mind that both devices use different frameworks for testing AI performance, so take these results with a grain of caution.
In real-world usage, both phones handled AI features seamlessly without any noticeable hiccups.
| Geekbench AI | iPhone 16 | Samsung S24 |
|---|---|---|
| Single Precision Score | ||
| CPU | 4182 | 2067 |
| GPU | 3855 | 1456 |
| NPU | 4179 | 278 |
| Half Precision Score | ||
| CPU | 7206 | 2079 |
| GPU | 4336 | 1528 |
| NPU | 32374 | 295 |
| Quantized Score | ||
| CPU | 5738 | 2994 |
| GPU | 4150 | 1477 |
| NPU | 44309 | 863 |
Conclusion: Who Wins?
After looking at the benchmarks, it’s clear the A18 chipset outperforms the Exynos 2400 processor in most categories. With strong CPU and GPU scores, it’s great for everything from gaming to content creation. Plus, its AI processing gives it an edge for those focused on performance and efficiency.
While the Galaxy S24 shines with better memory performance, it doesn’t quite match the iPhone 16 in raw power. If top-notch processing and graphics are your main concerns, go for the iPhone 16. However, if RAM and specific features matter more to you, the Galaxy S24 is still a solid option.
Ultimately, both phones deliver outstanding performance, so it comes down to your priorities. You can’t go wrong with either flagship!
